Zebralight SC64c LE vs Zebralight H600Fc
vs
Quick take: The Zebralight H600Fc is brighter (1,500 vs 950 lm); the Zebralight H600Fc throws farther (152m vs 146m); the Zebralight SC64c LE runs longer on high (3.5 vs 3 hrs).
| Spec | Zebralight SC64c LE | Zebralight H600Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99 | $99 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Type | EDC | Headlamp |
| Lumens | 950 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Candela | 5,300 cd | 5,800 cd |
| Beam distance | 146m | 152m |
| Runtime | 3.5 hrs (high) | 3 hrs (high) |
| Battery | 18650 | 18650 |
| LED | LH351D 4000K | XHP50.2 4000K Frosted |
| Beam type | Flood | Flood |
| Modes | 3 Stepped + Sub | 3 Stepped + Sub |
| UI | Zebralight UI | Zebralight UI |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| CRI | 90 | 80 |
| Weight | 1.8 oz | 1.8 oz |
| Dimensions | 3.6 x 1.0 in | 3.5 x 1.1 in |
| Warranty | Lifetime | Lifetime |
What owners report
Zebralight SC64c LE
- ✓Exceptional efficiency and runtime at the levels people actually use
- ✓Very small and light for an 18650 light — genuinely disappears in a pocket
- ✓Wide, floody LH351D beam that owners rate as close to ideal for everyday use
- ✓Dropping onboard charging and an overdriven turbo makes it simpler and more reliable
- ✓Deep, well-spaced mode set with a genuinely low moonlight level
- ✓Zebralight has been helpful to owners who requested a better tint sample
- ✗Not a true high-CRI light — one reviewer found red rendering weaker than other LH351D lights
- ✗No onboard charging, so an external charger and spare cells are required
- ✗The pogo-pin contact can dent flat-top cells if the light is knocked over
- ✗The Zebralight interface — click counts and timing — takes acclimatising
- ✗Expensive next to budget lights with similar output on paper
Zebralight H600Fc
- ✓Amazing, remarkably even tint with excellent colour rendering
- ✓Frosted lens gives a pure flood beam ideal for close work
- ✓Programmable levels including a genuine moonlight mode
- ✓Better medium-output runtimes than the previous Mk III generation
- ✓Zebralight's build quality and regulation
- ✗Mk IV thermal control is considered poorly implemented against the Mk III
- ✗The H1 top setting is unrealistic — it heats up very quickly
- ✗Tight battery compartment that won't accept all 18650s
- ✗Light bleeds through the switch at higher levels
- ✗Minor anodising imperfections near the cooling fins