Fenix TK22 V2.0 vs Fenix PD35 V3.0
Quick take: The Fenix PD35 V3.0 is brighter (1,700 vs 1,600 lm); the Fenix TK22 V2.0 throws farther (405m vs 357m); the Fenix TK22 V2.0 runs longer on high (2.5 vs 2.4 hrs).
| Spec | Fenix TK22 V2.0 | Fenix PD35 V3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $80 | $80 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Type | Tactical | Tactical |
| Lumens | 1,600 lm | 1,700 lm |
| Candela | 43,000 cd | 31,900 cd |
| Beam distance | 405m | 357m |
| Runtime | 2.5 hrs (high) | 2.4 hrs (high) |
| Battery | 21700 | 18650 |
| LED | Luminus SFT-40 | Luminus SFT-40 |
| Beam type | Throw | Throw |
| Modes | 4 Stepped | 5 Stepped |
| UI | Dual Switch | Dual Switch |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| CRI | 70 | 70 |
| Weight | 4.2 oz | 3.0 oz |
| Dimensions | 6.3 x 1.0 in | 5.4 x 1.0 in |
| Warranty | Lifetime | Lifetime |
What owners report
Fenix TK22 V2.0
- ✓1,600 lumens with 406 m of throw from a 21700
- ✓IP68 rated with overheat protection and a low-voltage indicator
- ✓Aluminium body handles heat well, holding brightness
- ✓Medium size and light for a tactical 21700 light
- ✓Well-made, with smooth lightly lubricated threads
- ✗No battery or charger included, and no onboard USB charging
- ✗Can't select turbo or moonlight directly from off
- ✗No momentary turbo
- ✗Warm to the touch at the highest setting
- ✗Needs a dedicated 21700 charger you may not own
Fenix PD35 V3.0
- ✓SFT40 upgrade takes maximum output from 1,000 to 1,700 lumens
- ✓Excellent regulation, plus thermal and reverse-polarity protection
- ✓Well-balanced 18650 tube sized for one-handed two-switch operation
- ✓High-quality accessories included: lanyard, USB cable and holster
- ✓Beam and tint both draw consistent praise
- ✗Cool white only — no neutral or high-CRI option
- ✗The 5-lumen eco level is too bright for genuine darkness
- ✗The side switch changes modes but can't switch the light on
- ✗Ships with a lower-capacity cell than Fenix's own 3,500mAh option
- ✗Highly focused beam — some prefer more spill for EDC