Fenix E35R vs Fenix TK22 V2.0
Quick take: The Fenix E35R costs $5 less; the Fenix E35R is brighter (3,100 vs 1,600 lm); the Fenix TK22 V2.0 throws farther (405m vs 253m); the Fenix TK22 V2.0 runs longer on high (2.5 vs 2 hrs).
| Spec | Fenix E35R | Fenix TK22 V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $75 | $80 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Type | EDC | Tactical |
| Lumens | 3,100 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Candela | 16,000 cd | 43,000 cd |
| Beam distance | 253m | 405m |
| Runtime | 2 hrs (high) | 2.5 hrs (high) |
| Battery | 21700 | 21700 |
| LED | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SFT-40 |
| Beam type | Balanced | Throw |
| Modes | 5 Stepped | 4 Stepped |
| UI | Simple | Dual Switch |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| CRI | 70 | 70 |
| Weight | 3.5 oz | 4.2 oz |
| Dimensions | 4.8 x 1.1 in | 6.3 x 1.0 in |
| Warranty | Lifetime | Lifetime |
What owners report
Fenix E35R
- ✓3,100 lumens and 246 m of throw from a genuinely pocketable body
- ✓TIR lens gives a precise, uniform beam
- ✓Top-notch fit and finish with even weight distribution
- ✓Built-in USB-C charging on the current version
- ✓Strobe available for self-defence use
- ✗No shortcuts to eco or turbo — you have to cycle through modes
- ✗The magnet is strong enough to collect keys and other metal
- ✗Slippery in the hand without the pocket clip
- ✗No holster included
- ✗Not a tactical light despite the output
Fenix TK22 V2.0
- ✓1,600 lumens with 406 m of throw from a 21700
- ✓IP68 rated with overheat protection and a low-voltage indicator
- ✓Aluminium body handles heat well, holding brightness
- ✓Medium size and light for a tactical 21700 light
- ✓Well-made, with smooth lightly lubricated threads
- ✗No battery or charger included, and no onboard USB charging
- ✗Can't select turbo or moonlight directly from off
- ✗No momentary turbo
- ✗Warm to the touch at the highest setting
- ✗Needs a dedicated 21700 charger you may not own