Skip to content

Emisar D4V2 vs Wurkkos FC12C

Quick take: The Emisar D4V2 costs $0.990000000000002 less; the Emisar D4V2 is brighter (4,200 vs 1,600 lm); the Wurkkos FC12C throws farther (332m vs 262m); the Wurkkos FC12C runs longer on high (1.9 vs 1.5 hrs).

SpecEmisar D4V2Wurkkos FC12C
Price$36$36.99
Rating——
TypeEDCEDC
Lumens4,200 lm1,600 lm
Candela17,100 cd28,825 cd
Beam distance262m332m
Runtime1.5 hrs (turbo)1.9 hrs (high)
Battery1865018650
LEDNTG35 4200KLuminus SFT40 6000-6500K
Beam typeFloodThrow
ModesRamping + SteppedRamping + Tactical
UIAnduril 2Dual UI
IP ratingIP67IP68
CRI95
Weight2.5 oz3.0 oz
Dimensions3.7 x 1.1 in5.4 x 0.9 in
WarrantyManufacturer LimitedNot stated

What owners report

Emisar D4V2

  • ✓Configure-to-order: emitter, tint, body material, switch and optics are all your choice
  • ✓Anduril is repeatedly called the best flashlight interface available once learned
  • ✓Owners four years in report zero reliability problems and excellent fit and finish
  • ✓Substantially outperforms similarly priced Olight and Nitecore models
  • ✓Aux LEDs under the optic make it findable and can show battery state
  • ✓Firmware is open, so the light keeps gaining features long after purchase
  • ✗Anduril's configuration menus are genuinely bewildering on first contact
  • ✗Ordering means intl-outdoor, long shipping times, and occasional order errors
  • ✗A quad in a small tube has little thermal mass — turbo steps down fast and the body gets hot
  • ✗No onboard charging on most configurations; you need a separate charger
  • ✗The choice matrix is paralysing if you don't already know what emitter you want